Skip to content
Platinum Network

The Iconic Puzzle Game Couldn't Succeed at The Game Awards — An Additional Classification Might Solve This

As any prominent honors show draws close, one notices a demand for introducing of new categories to recognize underappreciated efforts and fill the passions of followers who have specialized interests.

Another commentator previously argued for a horror game category. That would be fantastic. So would board games, which is a passionate advocate's mission. However, I must insist if I try to elbow in front just as with other single-minded supporters, there's a strong justification supporting my request is the most urgent above others. Here's the proposal: It's essential to create a classification for brain-teasing titles.

Categorizing Game Types

Classifying creative works isn't exact; opinions vary greatly, and typically spark debates and end in fuzzy definitions. There’s a reason cinema institutions don’t do it. However, it represents an unavoidable compromise for the industry of gaming, that demonstrate such variety they hardly constitute a single creative category.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of interactive entertainment excellence to gain proper attention, while allowing diverse titles to have a chance for representation, classification by type becomes crucial.

Present Award Structure

Leading game ceremonies offer these classifications covering Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Between them, these six categories successfully include a lot of ground, and you can find room for most games within them.

Different situation exists for brain-teasing titles. No appropriate category exists to put them. Think about these recent excellent titles, all very different: building puzzles in a particular game, fast-paced pattern recognition of another game, engaging interpersonal challenges of a third title. What category would fit them between these six categories? Nowhere, that’s where.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist outstanding logic titles launched regularly without proper recognition in entertainment awards, unless they happen to qualify classification types such as Handheld titles, VR/AR Game, or the extremely competitive small studio competitions.

  • A renowned logic title received no recognition in any category that year
  • Another imaginative release was excluded during that ceremony
  • Well-received sorting experience received no acknowledgment in 2021
  • Only a few logic titles managed to sneak into niche award types

Significance of Puzzle Games

These are often modest productions, yet the craft of the puzzle game carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games count as the most-played games in the world maintaining this status for many years.

The iconic tile-matching title competes with well-known building titles competing to become best-selling game of all time; it’s also in the running for best game of all time. Puzzle games are foundational to the art of video games, while interacting with diverse game types.

Proposal and Rationale

Logic titles wouldn't face this problem. One could readily select five nominees with fascinating, diverse, deserving games annually without trouble — perhaps, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave many worthy titles.

Restating the point, these represent titles that otherwise have no home at major gaming awards. Logic title developers are working at the hard edge interactive creation, creating some of the purest expressions of the video game form. Comparable to cinema stunt performers, they deserve recognition. We shouldn't delay 35 years.

About the author

Bobby Serrano

Maya is a digital strategist with over a decade of experience in IT consulting and tech innovation, specializing in cloud infrastructure.

Platinum Network

Type to search articles.